Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society ISSN:1229-2427(Print) 2288-646X(Online) 한국지반공학회 논문집

본 연구의 목적은 2017년 포항지진 시 액상화가 관측되었거나 액상화 가능성이 높은 부지 5곳에 대하여, 국내에서 통상적으로 적용해 왔던 액상화 평가 기준과 최근 개정된 평가 기준을 적용하여 액상화 평가를 실시하고, 이러한 이론적인 액상화 평가 결과와 대상 부지에서의 실제 액상화 발현여부를 비교･검토함으로써, 개정된 액상화 평가 기준의 타당성을 검토하는 데에 있다. 액상화 평가를 위한 해석지진은 기존 국내에서 통상적으로 사용해 온 지진파와 포항 실지진파를 사용하였고, 해석지진의 최대지반가속도 크기는 0.097g～0.2713g 범위의 값을 적용하였다. 해석결과로부터, 기존 국내에서 통상적으로 적용해 왔던 구조물기초설계기준(2016)에 제시된 액상화 평가 기준의 개선점을 제시하고, 2018년에 개정된 내진설계일반에 제시된 액상화평가 기준의 기존 기준대비 개정 사항의 상대적 타당성을 평가해 보았다.

In this study, liquefaction evaluation was performed by applying liquefaction evaluation criteria commonly applied in Korea and recently revised evaluation criteria to five sites where liquefaction was observed or potential for liquefaction was high during the 2017 Pohang earthquake. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of the revised domestic liquefaction evaluation criteria by comparing and reviewing the results of the theoretical liquefaction evaluation with the actual liquefaction occurrence at the sites. For the analysis of earthquakes for the evaluation of the liquefaction, the actual Pohang earthquake wave, as well as the waves that was conventionally used in Korea, was used. The magnitude of the peak ground acceleration of analysis earthquake varied from 0.097 g to 0.2713 g. From the analysis results, the validity of the liquefaction evaluation criteria presented in the 2016 Foundation Design Criteria, which has been commonly applied in Korea, was evaluated. From the evaluation results, the improvement of the existing criteria was suggested, and the suitability of revised items of liquefaction evaluation criteria presented in the Seismic Design General established in 2018 was confirmed.