All Issue

2013 Vol.29, Issue 5 Preview Page
Movement and Deposition Characteristics of Debris Flow According to Rheological Factors

유동학적 인자에 따른 토석류의 이동 및 퇴적 특성

Mi-Ji Lee1
,
Yun-Tae Kim2*
이 미지1
,
김 윤태2*
1Graduate Student, Dept. of Ocean Engrg., Pukyong National Univ.
2Associate Prof., Dept. of Ocean Engrg., Pukyong National Univ.
1부경대학교 해양공학과 석사과정
2부경대학교 해양공학과 부교수
*교신저자. *Corresponding Author. 
31 May 2013. pp. 29-27
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Most of the landslides induced by rainfall in summer rainy season appear in the type of debris flow. Debris flow gives a lot of economic losses and human casualties due to high moving velocity and volume of debris flow. In order to analyze movement and deposition characteristics of debris flow, numerical analysis using FLO-2D program was conducted with various viscosities and yield stresses. As a result of numerical analysis, velocity and runout distance of debris flow decreased as its viscosity increased due to resisting force between particles of debris flow. Consequently, flow depth of debris flow increased and impact force decreased. Yield stress of debris flow affected its initiation and deposition characteristics. As yield stress increased, runout distance of debris flow decreased and its impact force increased. Based on the results of numerical analysis, it was found that velocity of debris flow mainly depended on viscosity, while deposition characteristics (runout distance, deposition width, deposition area) of debris flow depended on both viscosity and yield stress.

Keywords
FLO-2D
Debris flow
Yield stress
Viscosity

여름철 강우로 인한 산사태는 대부분 토석류의 형태로 나타난다. 토석류는 빠른 이동속도와 체적 때문에 경제적 손실 뿐만 아니라 많은 인명피해를 일으킨다. 토석류 해석 프로그램인 FLO-2D를 사용하여 유동학적 인자인 점성과 항복응력에 따른 토석류의 이동과 퇴적 특성을 분석하였다. 수치해석을 수행한 결과, 점성이 증가할수록 토석류 입자 간의 응집력이 증가하여 토석류의 퇴적거리와 속도가 감소한다. 그에 따라 유동심은 증가하고 충격력은 감소하였다. 항복응력은 토석류의 발생과 퇴적에 큰 영향을 미치는 요인이다. 항복응력이 증가할수록 충격력은 증가하였다. 수치해석 결과에 의하면, 토석류의 이동속도는 주로 점성에 의존하나 토석류의 퇴적 특성(퇴적거리, 퇴적 폭, 퇴적면적)은 점성과 항복응력에 의존한다.

References
1
1.D. Rickenmann, D. Laigle, B.W. McArdell, and J. Hübl (2006), “Comparison of 2D debris-flow simulation models with field events”, Computational Geosciences, 10:241-264.
2
2.FLO-2D Software Inc., (2004), FLO-2D user’s manual.
3
3.Imran, J., Harff, P., and Parker, G. (2001), “A numerical model of submarine debris flow with graphical user interface”, computers & geosciences, Vol.27, No.6, pp.717-729.
4
4.Iverson, R.M., Ried, M.E., and LaHusen, R.G. (1997), “Debris-Flow Mobilization From Landslides”, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Vol. 25:85-138.
5
5.Iverson, R.M. (2003), “The debris-flow rheology myth”, In Debris- Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment (ed. Rickenmann & R. C. Chen), pp.303-314. Millpress, Rotterdam.
6
6.Jeong, Sueng-Won (2010), “Flow characteristics of landslides/debris flows: sediment rheology and mobility and mobility of landslides”, Proceedings of Korean Society of Engineering Geology (KSEG) Conference 2010, KSEG, pp.79-80.
7
7.Jeong, Sueng-Won (2011), “Rheological Models for Describing Fine-laden Debris Flows: Grain-size Effect”, Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.27, No.6, pp.49-61.
8
8.Kang, Hyo-Sub and Kim, Yun-Tae (2012), “Effect of Fines on Rheological Characteristics of Soil”, KGS Fall National Conference 2012 October 11-12, 2012/ Seoul/ Korea, 1171-1178
9
9.Kim, Sang-Kyu and Seo, Heung-Seok (1997a), “An Analysis of Debris Flow Movement Using Rheological Model”, Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society (KGS), Vol.13, No.5, p133-143.
10
10.Kim, Sang-Kyu and Seo, Heung-Seok (1997b), “Rheological Cha-racteristics of Debris Flows”, Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society (KGS), Vol.13, No.5, p125-131.
11
11.O’Brien, J.S. and Julien, P.Y. (1988), “Laboratory Analysis of Mud flow Properties”, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.114, No.8, pp.877-887.
12
12.O’Brien, J.S. and Julien, P.Y. (1985), “Physical Properties and mechanics of hyper-concentrated sediment flows”, Proceedings of the Specialty Conference on Delineation of Landslide, Flash Flood and Debris Flow Hazard in Utah, Utah State University, Utah, pp.260-279.
13
13.O’Brien, J.S. and Julien P.Y. (1988), “Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties”, J. of Hyd. Eng, ASCE, 114(8), 877-887.
14
14.O’Brien, J.S, Julien, P.Y., and Fullerton, W.T. (1993), “Two- dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation”, J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), pp.244-261.
15
15.Oh, KyungDoo (2011), “Lesson of Umyeon Mountain”, Seoul monthly technology magazine column, 2011, September.
16
16.Paik, JoongCheol and Kim, YoungIl (2011), “Runout characteristics of debris flow in Umyeon Mountain” River and Road in Mountain Area, Vol.4, 15-19.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Geotechnical Society
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지반공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지반공학회 논문집
  • Volume : 29
  • No :5
  • Pages :29-27
  • Received Date : 2013-01-04
  • Accepted Date : 2013-05-21
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2013.29.5.19
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
Archives
: Vol.23~28 (2007~2012)
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close