All Issue

2016 Vol.32, Issue 9 Preview Page
Stress Concentration Ratio of GCP Depending on the Mixing Ratio of Crushed Stone and Sand

GCP의 쇄석과 모래의 배합비 별 응력분담비

Seung-Ju Na1
,
Min-Seok Kim1
,
Kyung-Ho Park2
,
Daehyeon Kim3*
나 승주1
,
김 민석1
,
박 경호2
,
김 대현3*
1Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engrg., Chosun Univ.
2Member, Ph.D, Dept. of Civil Engrg., Chosun Univ.
3Member, Prof., Dept. of Civil Engrg., Chosun Univ.
1비회원, 조선대학교 토목공학과 석사과정
2정회원, 조선대학교 토목공학과 박사
3정회원, 조선대학교 토목공학과 교수
*교신저자. *Corresponding Author. 
30 September 2016. pp. 37-50
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Gravel compaction pile (GCP) is widely used as it increases the bearing capacity of soft ground and reduces the consolidation settlement. Stress concentration ratio for GCP design is dependent on the area replacement, surcharge pressure and depth. However, a range of stress concentration ratio obtained through field, laboratory experiments and numerical analysis is large. Little study has been done on the stress concentration ratio for the mixing ratio of gravel and sand. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the stress concentration ratio for both area replacement ratio and mixing ratio through literature review and numerical analysis. Numerical analysis using the finite element program ABAQUS 6.12-4 has been performed for the composite ground with GCP. The excess pore water pressure and stress concentration ratio of composite ground have been analyzed for both the area replacement ratio and the mixing ratio. Based on the previous research results, a range of stress concentration ratio obtained from the field tests, laboratory tests, numerical analysis on the GCP studies is found to be 1.7-3.2, 2.0-7.5 and 2.0-6.5, respectively. Based on the numerical analysis results, as the area replacement ratio increases, the stress concentration ratio increases up to 30% and then decreases at 40%. Also, the stress concentration ratio tends to increase up to 70:30 and then to decrease after 60:40.

Keywords
Area replacement ratio
Excess pore water pressure
GCP method
Mixing ratio
Stress concentration ratio

쇄석다짐말뚝(GCP)은 연약지반의 지지력 증가와 침하량의 감소를 실현할 수 있어 연약지반 개량에 활발하게 사용되고 있다. GCP 설계에 필요한 응력분담비는 치환율, 상재하중, 깊이 등에 따라 달라진다. 많은 연구자들이 현장실험, 실내실험, 수치해석 연구를 통해 쇄석으로 이루어진 GCP에 대해 치환율에 따른 응력분담비를 제시하였으나, 쇄석과 모래의 배합비에 따른 응력분담비에 관한 연구는 전무한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 선행연구 분석과 수치해석을 통해 배합비와 치환율에 따른 응력분담비를 명확히 규명하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 유한요소해석 프로그램인 ABAQUS 6.12-4를 사용하여 GCP가 시공된 복합지반을 모델링하여 배합비와 치환율에 따라 복합지반의 과잉간극수압과 응력분담비를 분석하였다. 선행연구 분석결과, GCP 복합지반의 응력분담비에 관한 연구에서 일반적으로 현장에서 정재하시험, 실내시험, 수치해석을 통해 얻은 응력분담비는 각각 1.7～3, 2～7.5, 2～6.5 범위로 나타났으며, 쇄석과 모래의 배합비에 관한 연구에서는 일반적으로 클로깅현상을 저감시키기 위해 실내실험 한 결과로 쇄석과 모래의 최적배합비가 70:30으로 나타났다. 수치해석결과, 일반적인 GCP 복합지반의 치환율이 증가함에 따라 응력분담비가 치환율 30%까지는 증가하다가 40%에서는 다시 감소하는 경향이 나타났으며, 쇄석과 모래의 배합비에 따른 응력분담비는 일반적으로 모래의 함유량이 증가함에 따라 쇄석과 모래의 배합비가 70:30까지는 증가하다가 60:40 이후에 다시 감소하는 경향이 나타났다.

References
1
 1.Aboshi, H., Yoshikuni, H., and Harada, K. (1970), “http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kgs/2016-032-09/N0990320904/images/PICE6EB.gif-consolidation of Clay with Large Sand Pile”, 5th Conference of JSSMFE, pp. 379-440.
2
 2.Bae, K.T. and Lee, C.K. (2007), “The Behavior of Rammed Aggregate Piers (RAP) in Soft Gmund(1)”, J. of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.23, No.4, pp.169-183.
3
 3.Busan New Port Corp. (1999), Report of North Container Terminal, pp.6.50-6.59.
4
 4.Cho, S.H. (1999), FEM Analysis of Sand Compaction-Pile-Treated Ground, Myunggi University, Master Thesis.
5
 5.Chu, I.C. (2013), A Experimental Study on The Optimum Mixing Ratio of Sand-Mixed Granular Compaction Pile, Hanyang University, Master Thesis.
6
 6.Choi, H.S. (2009), Engineering Properties of Compaction Pile Mixed with Crushed Stone and Sand, Hanyang University, Master Thesis.
7
 7.Choi, J.W., Lee, D.Y., and Yoo, C.S. (2013), “Undrained Characteristics of Geogrid-Encased Stone Column under Cyclic Load Using Reduced- Scale Model Tests”, J. of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.29, No.1, pp.109-120.
8
 8.Dassault Systemes (2008), Abaqus Version 6.12 Documentation. Providence, RI: Dassault Systemes.
9
 9.Heo, Y., Zheng, Z.D., Lee, C.K., and Ahn, K.G. (2006), “Centrifuge Modeling on Displacement Shapes of Composite Ground Improved by SCP and GCP”, J. of Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol. 7, No.5, pp.57-66.
10
10.Hong, E.J. (2002), Analysis of Sand Compaction Piles Under Flexible Surcharge Loadings, Yonsei University, Master Thesis.
11
11.Hong, Y.K. (2003), A Study on Characteristics of Bearing Capacity and Stress Concentration of Clay Ground Improved With Sand Compaction Piles, Kangwon National University, Ph.D. Thesis.
12
12.Ichmoto, E. (1981), “Result of Design and Construction of Sand Compaction Pile Method”, 36th JSSMFE Conference 51-55.
13
13.Jung, J.B. (1999), Study on Consolidation Behavior of Clay Ground Improved by Partly Penetrated Sand Compaction Piles, Hirosima University, Ph. D. Thesis.
14
14. Jeong, J.W., Lee, S.J., Park, N.W., and Chun, B.S. (2013), “A Numerical Study on the Prevention of Clogging in Granular Com-paction Pile”, J. of Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol.14, No.1, pp.43-51.
15
15.Kim, T.W. (2001), Numerical Analysis of The Behavior of Sand Compaction Pile in Clay, Dankook University, Master Thesis.
16
16. Kim, J.K. (2003), Load Transfer Characteristics of Sand Compaction Piles in Soft Ground, Yonsei University, Ph. D. dissertation.
17
17.Kim, Y.T., Park, H.I., Lee, H.J., and Kim, S.K. (2004), “Analysis of Stress Transfer Mechanism of Composite Ground Reinforced by SCP under Quaywall”, J. of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.2004, No.2004, pp.227-234.
18
18.Kim, J.H. (2009), (The) Experimental Study on Composite Ground Behavior and Aspect of Clay Gone Through Compaction Pile of Recycled Aggregate Compaction Piles, Hongik University, Master Thesis.
19
19.Kim, Y.T. and Ahn, J.H. (2012), “Consolidation Behavior and Stress Concentration Ratio of SCP Composite Ground”, Marine georesources & geotechnology, Vol.30, No.1, pp.1064-119X.
20
20. Kim, B.I., Yoo, W.K., Kim, Y.U., and Moon, I.J. (2013), “An Experimental Study on the Behavior of Composite Ground Improved by SCP and GCP with Low Replacement Ratio”, J. of the Korea Academia-Industrial, Vol.14, No.2, pp.936-942.
21
21. Lee, K.S. (2000), Finite-Element Modeling of the Stone Column With Varying Cross Section, Myunggi University, Master Thesis.
22
22.Lee, M.H., Choi, Y.G., Im, J.C., and Hawng, G.B. (2003), “A Study on the Stress Concentration of Crushed-stone Compaction Piles through Field Loading Test”, J. of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.19, No.6, pp.107-114.
23
23. Lee, M.H. (2004), A Study on the Load Support Mechanism and Stress Distribution Characteristic of Crushed-Stone Compaction Piles, Busan University, Master Thesis.
24
24. Lee, C.H., Lim, H.D., and Lee, W.J. (2005), “Finite Element Analysis of GCP Ground with Replacement Ratio”, KSCE J. of Civil Engineering, Vol.2005, No.10, pp.5459-5462.
25
25.Matsuoka, M., Kiga, S., and Harada, K. (1972), “On Characteristics of Settlement of Ground by Improved Vibro-Compozer Method”, 7th JSSMFE Conference, pp.391-394.
26
26.Park, Y.W., Kim, B.I., Yoon, G.L., Lee, S.I., Moon, D.J., and Kwon, O.S. (2000), “Behavior Characteristics of a Sand Compaction Pile with Varying Area Replacement Ratio”, J. of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.16, No.4, pp.117-128.
27
27.Song, M.G., Bae, W.S., Ahn, S.R., and Heo, Y. (2011), “Centrifugal Model Test on Stress Concentration Behaviors of Composition Ground under Flexible/Stiff Surcharge Loadings”, J. of Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol.12, No.6, pp.5-15.
28
28. Shin, H.Y. (2005), Analysis on the Behavior of Composite Ground Reinforced by Sand Compaction Pile with Low Area Replacement Ratio, Chungang University, Ph. D. Thesis.
29
29.Shin, H.Y., Han, S.J., Kim, S.S., and Kim, J.K. (2005), “Behavior of Composite Ground Improved by SCP with Low Replacement Ratio”, J. of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.25, No.6C, pp.369-378.
30
30.Takeda, N. and Nogawa, H. (1982), “Compressibility of Clay- Containing and Compaction Piles”, JSSMFE, Tsuchi-to-Kiso 30(2), pp.47-54.
31
31.Yoshikuni, H. (1979), “Design and Construction Management of Vertical Drain Method”, Soils and Found Series, Gihoudou, Tokyo.
32
32.Yamaauchi, K. and Hukumoto, K. (1982), “Stress Ratio of a Sand Pile and Cohesive Soil in Composite Ground”, 17th JSSMFE Conference, pp.391-394.
33
33. You, S.K. (2003), “Stress Shearing Behavior and its Mechanism during Consolidation Process of Composition Ground Improved by Sand Compaction Piles with Low Replacement Area Ratio”, J. of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.19, No.5, pp.301-310.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Geotechnical Society
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지반공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지반공학회 논문집
  • Volume : 32
  • No :9
  • Pages :37-50
  • Received Date : 2016-06-19
  • Revised Date : 2016-08-19
  • Accepted Date : 2016-08-25
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2016.32.9.37
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
Archives
: Vol.23~28 (2007~2012)
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close